Quantcast

Daily Traders Edge

‘This is the last article you’ll ever need to read on market timing,’ analyst claims

February 07
10:16 2019

Investing legend Peter Lynch once said, “Far more money has been lost by investors preparing for corrections, or trying to anticipate corrections, than has been lost in corrections themselves.”

Nick Maggiulli, judging from his latest post, would heartily agree.

“This is the last article you’ll ever need to read on market timing,” the Ritholtz Wealth Management analyst writes on his “Of Dollars and Data” blog. “It’s a bold claim, but I’m not messing around.”

In that “bold” spirit, Maggiulli set out this week to prove dollar-cost averaging (DCA) has historically outperformed the buy-the-dip approach, even when the dip-buyer absolutely nails the timing, which, of course, is next to impossible.

Here’s how he breaks down his research:

Imagine you are dropped somewhere in history between 1920 and 1979 and you have to invest in the U.S. stock market for the next 40 years.

You have 2 investment strategies to choose from:

DCA: You invest $100 (inflation-adjusted) every month for all 40 years.

Or…

Buy the Dip: You save $100 (inflation adjusted) each month and only buy when the market is in a dip… Not only will you buy the dip, but I am going to make you omniscient (i.e. “God”) about when you buy. You will know exactly when the market is at the absolute bottom between any two all-time highs. This will ensure that when you do buy the dip, it is always at the lowest possible price.

The only other rule in this game is that you cannot move in and out of stocks. Once you make a purchase, you hold those stocks until the end of the time period.

Which one’s better? Well, that’s got to be pretty obvious choice, right? The buy-the-dip would seemingly be a slam dunk.

Not so fast, according to Maggiulli’s number-crunching.

Continue Reading at Market Watch

Related Articles

Newsletter Signup

Sign up for our free newsletter